For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication ACLC

Dr. B.J. (Bart) Garssen

Faculty of Humanities
Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, Argumentatietheorie en Retorica
Photographer: onbekend
Visiting address
  • Spuistraat 134
  • Room number: 4.25
Postal address
  • Postbus 1637
    1000 BP Amsterdam
Contact details
  • Profile

    Bart Garssen is lecturer in the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric in the University of Amsterdam.

    He is editor of the book series Argumentation in Context (Benjamins)

    His research interests include:

    • fallacies
    • argument schemes and argumentative patterns
    • political argumentation
    • value judgements and their justification
  • Publications

    2026

    • Garssen, B. J., van Eemeren, F. H., & Xie, Y. (2026). For your own good: A replication of hidden fallaciousness research. Journal of Argumentation in Context. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.25038.van?locatt=mode:legacy
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2026). Descriptive and analytical qualitative research of argumentative discourse. In C. Andone, M. Doury, S. Greco, K. Hannken-Illjes, & M. H. Reijven (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Argumentation Studies (pp. 1-18). (Routledge Research in Communication Studies). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003502296-1 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., & Garssen, B. (2026). The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation. In S. Aikin, J. Casey, & K. Stevens (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory (pp. 54-62). (Routledge handbooks in philosophy). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003666851-8 [details]

    2024

    2023

    2022

    2021

    • Garssen, B. (2021). The Maxims of Common Sense: Strategic Manoeuvring with Figurative Analogies. In R. Boogaart, H. Jansen, & M. van Leeuwen (Eds.), The Language of Argumentation (pp. 213-227). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_11 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & labrie, N. (2021). Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.235 [details]

    2020

    2019

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2019). And then you are left holding the baby! : Strategic manoeuvring with the argumentum ad consequentiam. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 321-334). (Argumentation in Context; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.17van [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (Eds.) (2019). Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context. (Argumentation in Context ; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17 [details]

    2018

    • Garssen, B. (2018). “Metaphors are No Arguments, My Pretty Maiden”: The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Figurative. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 327-338). (Studies in logic; Vol. 77). College Publications. [details]

    2017

    • Garssen, B. (2017). Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 109-124). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.07gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. In F. H. van Eemeren, & W. Peng (Eds.), Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 145-158). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 12). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.09gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 31-52). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.02gar [details]

    2016

    • Garssen, B. (2016). Face the consequences! Strategic maneuvering with the argumentum ad consequentiam. In F. Paglieri, L. Bonelli, & S. Felletti (Eds.), The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion (pp. 245-253). (Studies in logic: Mathematical logic and foundations; Vol. 59). College Publications. [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2016). Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9378-y [details]

    2015

    • Garssen, B. (2015). Pragma-dialectics. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi104 [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2015). Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. In M. Lewiński, & D. Mohammed (Eds.), Argumentation in political deliberation (pp. 33-46). (Benjamins current topics; No. 76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 507-519). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_26 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 859-872). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_47 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). In Varietate Concordia-United in diversity: European Parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 843-858). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_46 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 595-609). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Reconstructing argumentative discourse with the help of speech act conditions. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 469-486). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_24 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Viewing the study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 275-296). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_14 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). De vermomde ad baculum drogreden empirisch onderzocht. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1557/TVT2015.1.EEME [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Effectiveness through reasonableness: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 771-791). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The Disguised Ad Baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering With Threats. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 1396-1407). Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 793-811). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_43 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 813-824). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_44 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Efectividad razonabele: pasos preliminares para una investicación pragma-dialéctica de la efectividad. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 181-207). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Investigación empírica del ad hominem abusivo: Maniobrar estratégico con ataques personales directos. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 257-279). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpretated. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 757-769). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_41 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). El método pragma-dialéctico de análisis y evaluación. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 127-154). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara.

    2014

    2013

    2012

    • Garssen, B. (2012). Charges of inconsistency and the tu quoque fallacy. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Inside arguments: logic and the study of argumentation (pp. 157-168). Cambridge Scholars. http://www.cambridgescholars.com/inside-arguments-16 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 43-58). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.4.03van [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). De vermomde 'abusive ad hominem'-drogreden empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(2), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2012.2.DE_V423 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective: preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The disguised 'abusive ad hominem' empirically investigated: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.678666 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 323-343). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_21 [details]

    2011

    • Garssen, B., & Kienpointner, M. (2011). Figurative analogy in political argumentation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 39-58). Benjamins. [details]
    • Visser, J., Bex, F., Reed, C., & Garssen, B. (2011). Correspondence between the pragma-dialectical discussion model and the argument interchange format. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 23(36), 189-224. http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol36.html [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2011). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 411-422). Rozenberg/Sic Sat. [details]

    2010

    • Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2010). A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Informal logic, 30(2), 122-141. http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2891/2404 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Constraints on political deliberation: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In D. S. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 505-514). National Communication Association. http://altaconference.org/contents/Alta16.html [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives on language use and pragmatics: a volume in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 35-50). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 16). Lincom Europa. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2010). De uitgebreide pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie empirisch geïnterpreteerd. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_U370 [details]

    2009

    • Garssen, B. (2009). Ad hominem in disguise: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(4), 207-213. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=47710427&site=ehost-live [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2009). Comparing the incomparable: figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 133-140). (Argumentation library; No. 14). Springer. [details]
    • Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2009). De pragma-dialectiek en de objectieve epistemische benadering van argumentatie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 (pp. 73-83). Van Gorcum. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: an overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 171-184). Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Putting pragma-dialectics into practice. In J. Sobocan, & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: can higher order thinking be tested? (pp. 247-262). Althouse. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency, 1(1), 23-42. http://www.cogency.udp.cl/ediciones/1/Cogency_v1_n1_03.pdf [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. (Argumentation library; No. 16). Springer. [details]

    2008

    2007

    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 437-440). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Esquemas argumentativos (translation). In R. Marafioti (Ed.), Parlamentos. Teoría de la argumentación y debate parlamentario Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B. (2007). Convergent operations in empirical ad hominem research. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 367-373). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2007). De conventionele deugdelijkheid van de pragma-dialectische discussieregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 251-274. http://taalbeheersing.letterentijdschriften.nl/index.php?url=article&atc_id=63 [details]

    2006

    • Garssen, B. J. (2006). Beweringen met nare consequenties: twee varianten van het argumentum ad consequentiam. In B. J. Garssen, & F. H. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
    • Garssen, B. J., van Eemeren, F. H., & Meuffels, B. (2006). This can't be true, that would be terrible: Ordinary arguers judgments about ad consequentiam fallacies. In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical Problems in Argumentation. Selected Papers (pp. 669-675). Washington DC: National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). Apples and oranges, peer pressure, and other such troublemakers: ordinary arguers' opinions about violations of the pragma-dialectical argument scheme rule. In P. Riley, & C. Willis-Chun (Eds.), Engaging argument: selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation: sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensics Association, and the University of Utah (pp. 445-452). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). La validez convencional de la regla pragma-dialectica de libertad. Praxis, 9, 17-32.

    2022

    2019

    2015

    2013

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2013). Viewing the study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 515-536). (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology; No. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_24 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2013). De vermomde abusive ad hominem empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 81-90). Koninklijke Van Gorcum. [details]

    2012

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Exploring argumentative contexts. (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies. (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Dialogue rules for argumentation. In S. Cantarini (Ed.), Dialogue: state of the art: studies in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 272-286). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 22). Lincom Europa. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation: the plenary debate in the European Parliament as an argumentative activity type. In M. Constantinescu, G. Stoica, & O. Uţă Bărbulescu (Eds.), Modernitate și interdisciplinaritate în cercetarea lingvistică: omagiu doamnei profesor Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu (pp. 227-241). Editura Universităţii din București. http://editura-unibuc.ro/?p=1772 [details]

    2011

    • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. John Benjamins. [details]
    • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Introduction. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 1-4). John Benjamins. [details]

    2009

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09 Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA8/papersandcommentaries/39/ [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Pondering on problems of argumentation: twenty essays on theoretical issues. Springer. [details]

    2008

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]

    2007

    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Argumenten in lijn. Een mening met een kaart funderen. Tekst[blad], 13(3), 16-19.
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Kwantitatief emperisch onderzoek van argumentatie. Ter inleiding. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 193-195. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. xv). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]

    2006

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Garssen, B. J. (2006). De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publications. [details]

    2024

    2020

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2020). A variety of contributions to argumentation theory. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory (pp. 1-10). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 35). Springer. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_1 [details]

    2019

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2019). A collection of studies of argumentation in practice. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 1-12). (Argumentation in Context; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.01van [details]

    2014

    • Garssen, B. (2014). Boekbesprekingen van Šorm (2010) en Timmers (2014) [Bespreking van: E. Šorm (2010) The good, the bad and the persuasive: normative quality and actual persuasivenes of arguments from authority, arguments from cause to effect and arguments from example; R.H.M. Timmers (2014) De wapens van de lezer: criteria voor argumentkwaliteit en de overtuigingskracht van argumentatie op basis van autoriteit, analogie en voor- en nadelen]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 36(3), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1557/TVT2014.3.DAZE [details]

    2012

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. xiii-xx). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.4.002int [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2012). Some highlights in recent theorizing: an introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 1-14). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_1 [details]

    2010

    Others

    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (7-2023). ISSA conference 2023, Leiden (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (14-9-2022). Argumentative style. Colloquium on argumentative style (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Andone, C. (organiser) & Garssen, B. (organiser) (7-10-2021). Argumentation in European Politics (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (3-7-2018 - 6-7-2018). Conference organization, Amsterdam. 9th ISSA Conference (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list.
  • Ancillary activities
    • No ancillary activities
edit contact information   edit profile page