dr. E.T. (Eveline) Feteris


  • Faculty of Humanities
    Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, Argumentatietheorie en Retorica
  • Visiting address
    P.C. Hoofthuis
    Spuistraat 134  Amsterdam
    Room number: 5.06
  • Postal address:
    Spuistraat  134
    1012 VB  Amsterdam
  • E.T.Feteris@uva.nl
    T: 0205254705
    T: 0205254716

2016

  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). Advancing reason to its further borders. In E. Pattaro & C. Roversi (eds.) A treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Legal philosophy in the Twentieth century: The civil law world. Volume 12.2. Heidelberg: Springer. (pp. 665-708) [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, 30(1), 61-79. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-015-9376-0 [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. A pragma-dialectical perspective. In E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, C.E. Smith (Eds.), Legal argumentation and the Rule of Law.. (pp. 47-58). The Hague. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions.: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, C.E. Smith (Eds.), Legal argumentation and the Rule of Law.. (pp. 47-58). Den Haag. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 2, pp. 3-14). (Studies in Logic; Vol. 63). London: College Publications. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2016). The Rediscovery of Rhetoric. In E. Pattaro & C. Roversi (eds.) A treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Legal philosophy in the Twentieth century: The civil law world. Volume 12.2. Heidelberg: Springer. (pp. 627-630). Heidelberg. [details]

2015

  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice. (pp. 199-120). (Argumentation in context; No. 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/aic.9.06fet [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. Bustamante, & C. Dahlman (Eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. (pp. 179-201). (Law and Philosophy Library; No. 112). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_11 [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). Strategic manoeuvring in the case of the 'Unworthy Spouse'. In M. Manzin, F. Puppo, & S. Tomasi (Eds.), Studies on argumentation and legal philosophy: Further steps towards a pluralistic approach (pp. 33-50). (Quaderni della facoltà di giurisprudenza; No. 10). Napoli: Università degli studi di Trento. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). The role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals, and values in the justification of judicial decisions. In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 414-425). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] [PDF]

2013

  • Feteris, E. T. (2013). Strategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. Law and Philosophy Library, 102, 85-101. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1_6 [details]
  • Feteris, E. (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world. (pp. 415-428). (Rhetoric in Society). Amsterdam: Leiden University Press. [details]

2012

  • Feteris, E. T. (2012). An argumentative approach to the burden of proof in legal and non-legal discussions. In G. Tessuto (Ed.), Approaches and perspectives. (pp. 23-42). (Explorations in language and law; No. 1). Aprilia: Novalogos. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2012). Strategic maneuvoeuvring with linguistic arguments in legal decisions: a disputable literal reading of the law. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2(1), 106-125. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2012). Strategic manoeuvring in the case of the 'Unworthy spouse'. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 149-164). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2012). Strategisch manoeuvreren in politieke cartoons met een visuele scenariometafoor. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(3), 199-212. DOI: 10.5117/TVT2012.3.STRA432 [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2012). The role of the judge in legal proceedings: a pragma-dialectical analysis. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(2), 234-252. DOI: 10.1075/jaic.1.2.05fet [details]
  • Feteris, E. (2012). The study of legal argumentation in argumentation theory and legal theory: approaches and developments. Cogency, 3(2), 11-32. [details]
  • Feteris, E., & Kloosterhuis, H. (2012). Een pragma-dialectische analyse van juridische argumentatie als onderdeel van een kritische discussie. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, J. A. Pontier, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011. (pp. 253-262). Den Haag: Boom. [details]
  • Kloosterhuis, H., & Feteris, E. (2012). De Rule of Law en het recht als argumentatieve praktijk. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, J. A. Pontier, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011. (pp. 243-252). Den Haag: Boom. [details]
  • Plug, H. J., Feteris, E. T., Kloosterhuis, H., Pontier, J. A., & Smith, C. E. (2012). Inleiding. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, J. A. Pontier, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het zesde symposium juridische argumentatie 24 juni 2011 (pp. 9-20). Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers. [details]

2011

  • Feteris, E. T. (2011). Strategic Manoeuvring in the Case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. In F. H. Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 448-460). Amsterdam: Rosenberg/Sic Sat. [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with linguistic arguments in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. van Haaften, H. Jansen, J. de Jong, & W. Koetsenruijter (Eds.), Bending opinion: essays on persuasion in the public domain (pp. 423-439). Leiden: Leiden University Press. [details]
  • Feteris, E., Groarke, L., & Plug, J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: a pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59-74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [details]
  • Feteris, E., & Kloosterhuis, H. (2011). Law and argumentation theory: theoretical approaches to legal justification. In B. van Klink, & S. Taekema (Eds.), Law and method: interdisciplinary research into law (pp. 253-273). (Politika; No. 4). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. [details]

2010

  • Feteris, E. T. (2010). De hoge raad kiest de veilige weg: een pragma-dialectische analyse van het strategisch manoeuvreren in de zaak van de onwaardige deelgenoot. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_H368 [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2010). The allocation of the burden of proof in mixed disputes in legal and non-legal contexts. Cogency, 2(1), 35-55. [details]

2009

  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). Strategic manoeuvring in the justification of judicial decisions. In F. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context: fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (pp. 93-114). (Argumentation in context; No. 1). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). Strategisch manoeuvreren met taalkundige argumentatie in een redelijke juridische discussie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 (pp. 63-72). Assen: Van Gorcum. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). Taalkundige argumentatie in een redelijke juridische discussie: aanvaardbare en onaanvaardbare vormen van strategisch manoeuvreren. Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis, 2009(2), 79-85. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). The role of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 93-111. [details]
  • Feteris, E. (2009). Strategic manoeuvres with linguistic arguments in legal decisions. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, & H. J. Plug (Eds.), Argumentation and the application of legal rules. (pp. 55-73). Amsterdam: Sic Sat / Rozenberg. [details]
  • Feteris, E. (2009). Strategic manoeuvring with linguistic arguments in the justification of legal decisions. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09 Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E., & Kloosterhuis, H. (2009). The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation: approaches from legal theory and argumentation theory. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16(29), 307-331. [details] [PDF]
  • Plug, H. J., Feteris, E. T., & Kloosterhuis, H. (2009). Introduction. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, & H. J. Plug (Eds.), Argumentation and the Application of Legal Rules. (pp. 1-12) [details]

2008

  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). A normative reconstruction of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. Dubrovskaya, & Y. V. Kitayeva (Eds.), Modern developments in linguistics and language teaching: II international conference proceedings, Moscow-Penza, 28-30 april 2008 = Sovremennye napravlenija v lingvistike i prepodavanii jazykov: materialy II meždunarodnoj naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii, Moskva-Penza, 28-30 aprelja 2008 (pp. 86-96). Moskva: MNEPU. [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). Models for the analysis of legal argumentation: introduction. Informal logic, 28(1), 1-5. [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). Strategic maneuvering with the intention of the legislator in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, 22(3), 335-353. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9100-4 [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). Strategisch manoeuvreren met onaanvaardbare gevolgen en de bedoeling van de wetgever: manifestaties van strategisch manoeuvreren in de rechtvaardiging van juridische beslissingen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 30(1), 58-74. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). The pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, 22(4), 489-506. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9083-1 [details] [PDF]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). The rational reconstruction of weighing and balancing on the basis of teleological-evaluative considerations in the justification of judicial decisions. Ratio Juris, 21(4), 481-495. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00402.x [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). Weighing and balancing in the justification of judicial decisions. Informal logic, 28(1), 20-30. [details] [PDF]

2007

  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). A normative reconstruction of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. (pp. 393-398). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). Comments on A.M. Vicunia. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). The pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological-evaluative argumentation in complex structures of legal justification. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007 Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). The rational reconstruction of teleological-evaluative arguments. In J. Aguilo - Regla (Ed.), Logic, argumentation and interpretation; proceedings of the IVR World Congress (22nd: 2005: Granada). (pp. 57-67). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. [details]

2006

  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Arguments from unacceptable consequences in the justification of judicial opinions. In C. Dahlman, & W. Krawietz (Eds.), Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse.. (pp. 225-237). (Rechtstheorie, Beiheft; No. 21). [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Complexe argumentatie op basis van doelen en gevolgen bij de toepassing van rechtsregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(1), 15-25. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Is de redelijkheid als argument een waardig familielid in een kritische discussie? In B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren. (pp. 23-36). Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Pragmatic argumentation in law: A pragma-dialectical reconstruction of argumentation from unacceptable consequences in judicial decisions. In F. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on argumentation. Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference. (pp. 113-126). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). The rational reconstruction of argumentation referring to consequences and purposes in the application of legal rules: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation, 19(4), 459-470. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). The rational reconstruction of complex forms of legal argumentation: Approaches from artificial inteligence and law and pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 19(4), 393-400. [details]

2016

  • Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H. J., & Smith, C. (2016). Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law. (pp. 1-16). The Hague: Eleven international publishing. [details]

2011

  • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Introduction. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 1-4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [details]

2009

  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). Inleiding: [themanummer over taalkundige argumentatie]. Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis, 2009(2), 59-60. [details]
  • Feteris, E. (2009). Strategic manoeuvring with linguistic arguments in the justification of legal decisions. In Rhetoric in society: proceedings of the Second Conference Rhetoric in Society, Leiden University, Leiden, January 21-23 2009 [cd-rom] Leiden: Leiden University. [details]

2007

  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). Een rationele reconstructie van het wegen van belangen op basis van doelen. In J. A. Pontier (Ed.), bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). La ricostruzione razionale dell'argomentazione teleologico-consequenzialista nella giustificazione delle decisioni giudiziali: una prospettiva pragam-dialettica. Ragion pratica, 27, 537-548. [details]
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). Teleological argumentation. In IVR encyclopedia of jirisprudence, legal theory and philosopy of law [digital encyclopedia]. [details]

Book editor

  • Feteris, E. T., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H. J., & Smith, C. E. (2016). Legal argumentation and the Rule of law. The Hague: Eleven international publishing. [details]
  • Pontier, J. A., Feteris, E. T., Kloosterhuis, H., & Plug, H. J. (2007). 'Alles afwegende....' : bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 22 juni 2007 te Rotterdam. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri. [details]
This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications.
  • No ancillary activities

edit contact information edit tabs