We explain the typology of sound systems by modelling phonology as well as phonetics bidirectionally (i.e. we model the speaker as well as the listener), and by modelling the acquisition and cross-generational evolution of all this. We either model this in a symbolic framework based on strict constraint ranking (Optimality Theory), or in a distributed framework based on artificial neural networks. If we employ a symbolic framework, we employ at least five representations (one ‘semantic’, two phonological, two phonetic) and four constraint families that connect these representations to each other (see picture). We model the processes of comprehension and production and their acquisition and evolution explicitly with computer simulations, and we test aspects of this model by performing laboratory experiments with adults and infants.
Deconstructing pitch accent: a new perspective on word-prosodic typology. Jeroen Breteler, LOT/NWO Graduate Programme.
Does the Dutch contrast between reten and reden prepare native Dutch speakers for learning the English contrast between bat and bad? , Camilla Horslund, DFF scholarschip.
Primitives of phonological representations. Mirjam de Jonge, NWO Promoties in de Geesteswetenschappen.
The emergence of French phonology. Jan Willen van Leussen, Boersma's VICI project
The phonology of pharyngeal consonants in modern Hebrew. Itsik Pariente
The learnability of phoneme inventories. Klaas Seinhorst.